Blogging is dead! That’s right…it’s dead, gone, worthless to even consider starting your own blog and a complete waste of time if you already have one.
Yes folks, blogging is completely passé, it’s just sooo 2004 or that’s what Paul Boutin of Wired News would have you believe when you read his article, Twitter, Flickr, Facebook Make Blogs Look So 2004. And he starts things off with this kicker:
Thinking about launching your own blog? Here’s some friendly advice: Don’t. And if you’ve already got one, pull the plug.
Now isn’t that a fine way to get attention?
And with what should you replace your blogging with pray tell? Why Flickr, Facebook and Twitter for starters, that’s what. It’s just so much easier and efficient that way.
Cut-rate journalists and underground marketing campaigns now drown out the authentic voices of amateur wordsmiths. It’s almost impossible to get noticed, except by hecklers. And why bother? The time it takes to craft sharp, witty blog prose is better spent expressing yourself on Flickr, Facebook, or Twitter.
So instead of sitting down with a concept and idea and putting them down on virtual paper for others to read and perhaps comment upon, instead of taking your time proof reading and perhaps changing a word or two here, a phrase or two there to make sure you get your point across, you should actually be limiting yourself to expressing your ideas, thoughts and feelings to 140 characters or less? If you can’t do that obviously you’re wasting your time? One picture is worth a thousand words I suppose? Not in this case it doesn’t. Which words? What words?
And what about the good folks who stop by your blog every day and leave comments? What about them?
Apparently, according to the article, the only type of commenter a new blogger is likely to get these days are bottom feeding trolls and insult/hate mongers. Same goes for us blogging veterans if we choose to continue in this apparently foolish endeavor of ours according to what Paul has to say. A complete waste of time.
And why is that you wonder?
Because we’ll all be drowned out by those cut-rate journalists and underground marketing campaigns he speaks of, that’s why. So expressing yourself through a social network is better? I think not.
Okay, okay…I admit that any time you quote from an article you can’t help but take that quote out of context and inevitably end up giving the wrong impression. And that’s exactly what I’ve done here. And by the way…that last quote up above is exactly 309 characters long which is hardly enough to give anyone reading my little post here of what Paul’s article is actually trying to say. My point here is that you simply cannot express yourself like you can on your own blog when you limit yourself to the likes of Flickr, Facebook and Twitter.
Sorry folks but Twitter ain’t blogging. It’s the online equivalent to text messaging. It’s a fine service, but it ain’t blogging.
The problem herein lies in that he’s attempting to compare the classic personal or niche style blog each with it’s own social microcosm of posts, comments and replies to the popular social networks of today as if they were the same type of thing. They’re not. It’s the old apples and oranges routine done in virtual.
Facebook, Flickr and Twitter definitely have their place and purpose and can easily compliment blogging and visa-versa but they can never replace blogging. And I don’t know about anybody else but as far as I’m concerned the days of rating your blog according to Google’s Page Rank and old standby’s like Technorati are over. While Technorati is still a great way to see who’s linking to your blog, it’s no longer an accurate gauge as to how “important” your blog really is and neither is Google’s Page Rank really.
For example:
If I put my online moniker, Kirk M, into a Google search my little 3 year old personal blog is 3rd from the top on the first page of results and that’s a general search, not a blog search. And according to Google, my small, low trafficked, non-Stumbled, non-Dugg corner of the blogosphere actually has a Page Rank of 5.
Now what does that tell you about accuracy?
Still, I hardly think I’ll quit simply because Paul’s article made the headline’s today (even though the article is hardly the truth of the matter) or because Jason Calacanis happened to retire from blogging earlier this year after he made millions from his Weblogs network.
And really, who cares? He did his thing, had his hand in…well…enough surprisingly familiar online entities to gain much notoriety (both good and bad), and an entry in Wikipedia (and I imagine much, much more). He made lots of $$$ doing what he did and then he retired at the ripe old age of 38—the bum. More power to him I say (he’s still a bum).
So thanks for your concern and kind advice Mr. Paul Boutin but I believe I’ll just keep puttering along the way I have been, thank you very much. I like putting my ugly mug out in public view and I just happen to be very fond of those fellow bloggers I’m happy to call my friends that I met while I was doing so.
You can look over the article for yourself of course but the way I read it, it’s a fine piece of well written satire never mind being a load of somewhat obvious comment bait. And I will say that as a journalist, Paul Boutin really seems to know his stuff especially when it comes to getting people’s attention. After all, to write a great satirical piece, you have to understand exactly what you’re referring to, don’t you?
Seems kind of funny though that when I pointed out something similar in a comment on his article, it posted as the 97th comment and there haven’t been any since.
How about that?