<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3-Visual Refresh. A Change for the Better.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://just-thinkin.net/2008/01/firefox-3-visual-refresh-a-change-for-the-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/01/firefox-3-visual-refresh-a-change-for-the-better/</link>
	<description>C'mon in, have some coffee, we'll talk.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KirkM</title>
		<link>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/01/firefox-3-visual-refresh-a-change-for-the-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13373</link>
		<dc:creator>KirkM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://just-thinkin.net/2008/01/firefox-3-visual-refresh-a-change-for-the-better/#comment-13373</guid>
		<description>You know how people hate change and personally I'm with you on this one. I like the buttons.

About the drop down for back and forward. If you think about it it makes perfect sense when you realize that it now operates the same way as viewing your "History" does. History makes no distinction either way and now neither does the drop down menu. To me it makes the old way of doing things look a bit foolish. Funny that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know how people hate change and personally I&#8217;m with you on this one. I like the buttons.</p>
<p>About the drop down for back and forward. If you think about it it makes perfect sense when you realize that it now operates the same way as viewing your &#8220;History&#8221; does. History makes no distinction either way and now neither does the drop down menu. To me it makes the old way of doing things look a bit foolish. Funny that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grandad</title>
		<link>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/01/firefox-3-visual-refresh-a-change-for-the-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13372</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://just-thinkin.net/2008/01/firefox-3-visual-refresh-a-change-for-the-better/#comment-13372</guid>
		<description>The buttons were the first thing I noticed today.  There has been a lot of criticism of the Back button, but I like it.

I also like the drop-down for navigation - the idea of integrating back and forward into one list, though that will take a little getting used to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The buttons were the first thing I noticed today.  There has been a lot of criticism of the Back button, but I like it.</p>
<p>I also like the drop-down for navigation - the idea of integrating back and forward into one list, though that will take a little getting used to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
