Open Source Software. I just don’t get it. | A reply

You never know what kind of response you might get from a post. Anyone who blogs realizes this.

You might write a post believing that it would elicit a decent response in the way of comments only to find it languishing in a desert of non-responsiveness. Then there are the other “spur-of-the-moment” type posts you may not expect a visitor to even read let alone comment upon that suddenly have a crop of comments growing under them. These comments can happen all at once or over a period of several days. Some comments even take their sweet time in coming after having no comments at all the first few days but any way they come–it usually comes as a bit of surprise.

And my “spur-of-the-moment” post about open source software is a no exception.

I really didn’t expect much of a response to the above mentioned post if any at all simply because it was a spur of the moment type of thing and laced with my attitude at the time which, I admit, wasn’t very good at the given moment of writing.

With that said I will remind everyone who might grace this blog with their visits (I mean that sincerely by the way, it’s nice having folks drop by) that this is a personal blog, not a professional or even semi-professional one and my posts will flow with my moods as can be expected on any personal type journalistic effort.

Even so, what I originally posted wasn’t made up or simply posted as comment bait. My experience has shown that there are more than a few people out there who simply can’t grasp the concept of open source software nor the people who spend their time developing it and then (usually) giving it away.

Okay, with that out of the way…

So what a surprise it was when, after several days of the post just virtually lying there, the comments started to come in. And coming in at a steady rate no less. Not a flood of comments all at once as if I was Dugg or Stumbled but rather comments from interested folks who just decided to pay a visit to see what I was talking about. And majority of them appeared to be developers of open source software no less.

And such a variety of responses as well.

The comments have ranged from those who made honest attempts at explaining their desire/drive to develop open source software so that I might have a better understanding, to responses criticizing my apparent attitude on the subject and how it might be improved, all the way to a few that bordered on the precarious edge of being downright insulting.

And there was even one commenter who decided that neither I nor my attitude was worth a tinker’s damn and that I should obviously just die–badly. Here’s an excerpt:

I don’t think I want to meet you. You’re probably not a very nice person. One might go so far as to wonder if your mommy never loved you, or ask how many bodies are hidden in your basement. Also, why are you blogging about this? Go away. Go away and die alone in a basement filled with rats.

I have to admit that one gave me a chuckle. Obviously this guy was having a worse day than I was when I wrote the original post. Perhaps he’d been banging his head against a recalcitrant bit of code that absolutely refused to do what it was supposed to do?

Anyway, for what it’s worth, here’s a bit of a reply to a few points made by those folks who thought my post was worth a comment or two:

  • Surprising as it might be, I can more than understand relating the development of open source software as a type art form or just growing flowers for the heck of it. I agree, it’s an apt analogy. I spent more than two decades as a (damn good) sound engineer until  my hearing degraded to the point where I had to quit the industry (service-related injury caused progressive hearing loss—just so there’s no misunderstanding). In fact the person running the sound board, if they’re any good at all, are probably as misunderstood by some as open source software developers are. The board is their instrument, they just don’t stand on the stage or in the recording studio. Hell, I even grew long stemmed roses for a time. They were quite lovely.
  • Contrary to some folks’ assumptions, I’m not brainwashed or money oriented in any way nor does the concept of “software should be free” frighten me at all. Sure, I’m what you might call, “every day practical”–you have to be, especially these days. But my world and head for that matter doesn’t revolve around money or the concept that “you always get what you pay for”.  The idea that “quality costs” as far as software is concerned has become less true than ever these days.
  • Developing code for a big company (as in said code now belongs to the company, not the developer) as an example of fueling the drive to develop OSS is an excellent point. Thanks to all those who pointed that out.
  • Sharing software that you developed for yourself in hopes that others might find it useful. Another fine point made and taken as such.
  • Sticking it to Microsoft, Adobe and the other big boys? Saying that we don’t need them? Okay, I can buy that—so to speak. I’d expect it does something to promote innovation and change within these bad boys as well?
  • And no, I’m not going to go away and die alone in a basement filled with rats. My basement doesn’t have any rats. The cats keep them away.

To be honest about it, I’ll probably never be able to wrap my head around programming and writing up code. This is probably for the same reason that I have extreme difficulty learning a different language other than my own and what is programming after all but learning a different language? Life’s much too short and I’m getting a bit too long in tooth to be banging my head against something my head has such a difficult time understanding. I’ll simply have to settle for finding problems, reporting bugs and participating in forums as I have all along.

And so there’s no mistake, I never said that I don’t appreciate the effort that these open source software developers put into their projects, I most certainly do. However, I’ve always been a bit of a cynic as well and that is bound to show up—especially on this blog.

Now I believe I’ll go check the basement for rats—just in case.


Comments

Open Source Software. I just don’t get it. | A reply — 6 Comments

  1. So I just read both posts and comments and thought I would share the “money” in it. I work for a large .com and we regularly open source software we have developed. We do so because we treat the product as a service to ourselves. For instance a recently open sourced project complements our application monitoring. We filled a gap that existed in current tools and developed a product that was good enough. Now, we would love to have it be better, but can not continue to dedicate resources to it now that the gap is adequately filled.
    So the solution…open source it! application monitoring is not our core competency but many(most? all?) organizations need to do it as well. As they develop the product to suit their needs and make incremental improvements we reap the rewards. In the short time we open sourced this particular project there have been 2 significant updates that we have benefited from.
    I wish I could say its all skittles and rainbows but more and more companies are realizing that open sourcing internal projects that are not their core competency means they can continue to see improvements with minimal resource expense.

    • Anon – Thanks for taking the time to offer a well reasoned explanation. I think a lot of people (average user?) simply don’t understand how OSS can be a great asset even though it’s “free”. Our society is so money oriented that most folks can’t can’t wrap their minds around the concept that something they don’t have to pay for could actually do them good.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>