<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Just Thinkin' &#187; BackWoods Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://just-thinkin.net/category/backwoods-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://just-thinkin.net</link>
	<description>Consistently Inconsistent</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Time to Split</title>
		<link>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/06/time-to-split/</link>
		<comments>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/06/time-to-split/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirk M</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BackWoods Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[JT Evening News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://just-thinkin.net/2008/06/time-to-split/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s right folks, it&#8217;s high time I split this business! I&#8217;ve had enough of this blog of mine being filled with subjects that simply don&#8217;t coincide with one another and it&#8217;s past time to call it done with and split&#8230;.
&#8230;the blog into two pieces that is.
So no, I&#8217;m not quitting the blogging business, I&#8217;m just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right folks, it&#8217;s high time I split this business! I&#8217;ve had enough of this blog of mine being filled with subjects that simply don&#8217;t coincide with one another and it&#8217;s past time to call it done with and split&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;the blog into two pieces that is.</p>
<p>So no, I&#8217;m not quitting the blogging business, I&#8217;m just splitting the tech/geek stuff off to a new site I&#8217;m currently working on. To explain further read on&#8230; <br/></p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img src="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/gmg.jpg" style="BORDER-RIGHT: #008000 10px groove; BORDER-TOP: #008000 10px groove; BORDER-LEFT: #008000 10px groove; WIDTH: 400px; BORDER-BOTTOM: #008000 10px groove; DISPLAY: inline; HEIGHT: 134px" height="134" width="400"/></p>
<p>My first and only original blog, <a href="http://just-thinkin.net" rel="tag" title="My longtime personal blog">Just Thinkin&#8217;</a>, first started out nearly 3 years ago as just a personal type of thing running on the old Blogger service (under a different title) and that went on for 6 very frustrating months or so until I moved it to WordPress.com as <em>Just Thinkin&#8217;</em> and finally to it&#8217;s own custom install (here).</p>
<p>In it&#8217;s own install, things went a lot better until that fateful and inevitable day when my old tech head/geeky-ness reared it&#8217;s ugly head once again and as a result more and more tech type posts involving Firefox, WordPress, various blogging tools and writers, tips and tricks, how-to&#8217;s and more began to sneak their way in amongst the personal and opinion type posts to the point that over half the traffic I received was tech related. Meanwhile, <em>Just Thinkin&#8217;</em> was <em>supposed</em> to be evolving into a more &#8220;Boomer&#8221; type &#8220;IM[not so]HO&#8221; type articles which were being overshadowed by the tech related stuff. This obviously was not where I wanted <em>Just thinkin&#8217;</em> to go so I needed another place where I could put these &#8220;geek&#8221; posts.</p>
<p>And so was born <a href="http://www.greenmtngeek.com/" title="A personal look and WordPress, Firefox, open source and more.">Green Mountain Geek</a>. It&#8217;s not <em>even</em> close to being the finished product yet but at least now I have a place to put the tech/geek articles instead of trying to blend them in here. It might even be a fairly decent site once I finish setting it up, ya&#8217; never know. Until then, wear your hard hat.</p>
<p>In the meantime I&#8217;ll be editing several of the existing Firefox and WordPress posts, bringing them up to date and republishing them on GMG even though it&#8217;s not finished yet. The idea is to keep anymore tech type posts off of here so I can finish turning <em>Just Thinkin&#8217;</em> into what it should be.</p>
<p>The theme to GMG is called <a href="http://justintadlock.com/archives/2007/12/09/structure-wordpress-theme" rel="tag" title="A theme for news/magazine sites with a blog-friendly option too">Structure</a> and the blogging platform is <a href="http://wordpress.org/" rel="tag" title="The blogging platform of choice">WordPress</a> (of course) and I&#8217;m going to have a hell of a good time writing for both of these sites or at least I will once I finally manage to get things properly set up and that horribly (and wonderfully) complicated theme figured out.</p>
<p>To be continued&#8230;</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://just-thinkin.net/tag/the-blog/" title="the blog" rel="tag">the blog</a><br />

	<h4>Possibly Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2007/10/writers-block-am-i-depressed-or-what/" title="Writers Block. Am I depressed or what? (October 1, 2007)">Writers Block. Am I depressed or what?</a> (16)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2007/12/when-conversation-lost-became-just-thinkin/" title="When Conversation Lost became Just Thinkin&#8217; (December 22, 2007)">When Conversation Lost became Just Thinkin&#8217;</a> (4)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2007/10/what-about-bob-the-break-out-blogger-award/" title="What About BOB? The Break Out Blogger Award (October 11, 2007)">What About BOB? The Break Out Blogger Award</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2007/01/upgrading-to-21-please-standby/" title="Upgrading to 2.1-Please standby (January 22, 2007)">Upgrading to 2.1-Please standby</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2008/01/upgrading-the-theme/" title="Upgrading the theme&#8230; (January 14, 2008)">Upgrading the theme&#8230;</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/06/time-to-split/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vernal Egginox 2008</title>
		<link>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/the-vernal-egginox-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/the-vernal-egginox-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 14:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirk M</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BackWoods Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Life at home]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The holidays]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Spring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/the-vernal-egginox-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it&#8217;s a bit late but we did our annual egg standing bit or should I say that my honey did actually since I was headed down to the VA at the time. So for those that still don&#8217;t know about this, the Vernal Equinox is the only time during the year where you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s a bit late but we did our annual egg standing bit or should I say that my honey did actually since I was headed down to the VA at the time. So for those that still don&#8217;t know about this, the Vernal Equinox is the only time during the year where you can easily stand a raw egg on it&#8217;s end. If you&#8217;re really good you can stand it on it&#8217;s narrow end.</p>
<p>So without further ado, here&#8217;s a pic of this year&#8217;s vernal egginox.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/vernal-egginox.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" border="0" alt="Click for larger somewhat fuzzy image" src="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/vernal-egginox-thumb.jpg" width="244" height="184" /></a>&#160;</p>
<p align="left">And have a Happy Easter as well everyone.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://just-thinkin.net/tag/spring/" title="Spring" rel="tag">Spring</a><br />

	<h4>Possibly Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2007/02/weather-in-punxsutawney-pa-an-early-spring/" title="Weather in Punxsutawney, PA-An Early Spring? (February 2, 2007)">Weather in Punxsutawney, PA-An Early Spring?</a> (5)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2006/03/veritable-egganox/" title="Veritable egganox (March 23, 2006)">Veritable egganox</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2008/05/the-mower-the-merrier/" title="The Mower the Merrier (May 7, 2008)">The Mower the Merrier</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2007/11/tags-and-categories-tagged-again-part-ii/" title="Tags and Categories-Tagged Again! Part II (November 14, 2007)">Tags and Categories-Tagged Again! Part II</a> (12)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2006/04/spring-has-sprung-or-almost/" title="Spring has sprung (or almost) (April 2, 2006)">Spring has sprung (or almost)</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/the-vernal-egginox-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE 8.0 Passes the Acid2 Test? Not here it doesn&#8217;t.</title>
		<link>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/ie-80-passes-the-acid2-test-not-here-it-doesnt/</link>
		<comments>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/ie-80-passes-the-acid2-test-not-here-it-doesnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirk M</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BackWoods Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox/Thunderbird]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Acid tests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[browser wars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/ie-80-passes-the-acid2-test-not-here-it-doesnt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long has the Acid Tests been one of the signs of a properly built web browser and the venerable Acid2 test has been the one to beat for years now. The tests are certainly not the end all and be all of web standards compliance but it&#8217;s a good start. Back in December when Firefox [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long has the <a title="The Acid Tests" rel="tag" href="http://www.acidtests.org/" target="_blank">Acid Tests</a> been one of the signs of a properly built web browser and the venerable Acid2 test has been the one to beat for years now. The tests are certainly not the end all and be all of web standards compliance but it&#8217;s a good start. Back in December when Firefox 3 beta 2 was about to hit the streets and I was testing the nightly builds of beta 3 I ran a post containing the results of running the <a title="Firefox 3 Beta 2 this month-Beta 3 in the trunk" rel="tag" href="http://just-thinkin.net/2007/12/firefox-3-beta-2-this-month-beta-3-in-the-trunk/" target="_blank">Acid2 test in Firefox 2, Firefox 3b3pre and IE 7.0</a> and comparing the 3 resulting images side by side. The results of course showed that Firefox 2 didn&#8217;t quite cut the mustard, IE 7.0 failed horribly and Firefox 3 passed with flying colors.</p>
<p>But what about now? What about the 3 <em>main </em>browser makers that are getting close to releasing their next version? We&#8217;ve got 3 different beta versions running around and playing in the streets even as I write this so how do they stack up I wonder? Especially the new kid on the block, IE 8.0. Well let&#8217;s find out shall we?</p>
<p>For this round I&#8217;m using Internet Explorer 8.0 beta, Opera 9.5 beta and the latest nightly build of Firefox 3b5pre. The Acid2 test results are below: (and yes, the nose turned blue when I hovered the mouse over it on the first two results).</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/firefox-3b5pre.jpg" alt="Firefox 3b5pre" width="189" height="260" /><br />
<strong>Firefox 3b5pre</strong></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/opera-95-beta.jpg" alt="Opera 9.5 beta" width="204" height="256" /><br />
<strong>Opera 9.5 beta</strong></p>
<p align="center"><strong></strong></p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/ie-80-beta.jpg" border="0" alt="IE 8.0 beta" width="199" height="255" /><br />
<strong>IE 8.0 beta</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">Whoa! Now wait a minute. Wasn&#8217;t it announced on the <a title="Internet Explorer 8 and Acid2: A Milestone" rel="tag" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2007/12/19/internet-explorer-8-and-acid2-a-milestone.aspx" target="_blank">IE Blog</a> way back in December that IE 8.0 <em>passed </em>the Acid2 test? Why yes, I believe they did. So why the failed result above I wonder? Well, it could be due to the info in this comment left by Chris Phillips left at the <a title="Ben and Dion’s Ajax Platform" rel="tag" href="http://ajaxian.com/" target="_blank">Ajaxian</a>. I think I remember reading about this back then.</p>
<blockquote><p>I wonder if IE8 passed a working Acid2 test:<br />
<a href="http://www.hixie.ch/tests/evil/acid/002/"></a><a href="http://www.hixie.ch/tests/evil/acid/002/">http://www.hixie.ch/tests/evil/acid/002/</a></p>
<p>Or the broken Acid2 test:<br />
<a href="http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html"></a><a href="http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html">http://www.webstandards.org/files/acid2/test.html</a></p>
<p>Acid2 on the webstandards site is broken because it uses an invalid embedded link that is returning 200 instead of 404.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/ie-8-now-doesnt-trip-on-acid">IE 8 now doesn’t trip on Acid</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Yup! I remember now. At the time the IE developers ran their new baby through the test it was &#8220;broken&#8221; and for all those watching, it passed the test. If anyone is running IE 8.0 beta, give the 2 links a try and you&#8217;ll see for yourself.</p>
<p align="left">Tomorrow I&#8217;ll run these beta&#8217;s through the dreaded <em>Acid3 Test</em> and see what kind of results I get. I can already tell it ain&#8217;t gonna be pretty.</p>
<p align="left">

	Tags: <a href="http://just-thinkin.net/tag/acid-tests/" title="Acid tests" rel="tag">Acid tests</a>, <a href="http://just-thinkin.net/tag/browser-wars/" title="browser wars" rel="tag">browser wars</a><br />

	<h4>Possibly Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li>No related posts.</li>
	</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/ie-80-passes-the-acid2-test-not-here-it-doesnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IE 8.0 to Adhere to Web Standards</title>
		<link>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/ie-80-to-adhere-to-web-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/ie-80-to-adhere-to-web-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirk M</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BackWoods Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[IE 8.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/ie-80-to-adhere-to-web-standards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been announced at Mary Jo Foley&#8217;s &#34;All About Microsft&#34; blog (ZDNET) and at the IE Blog itself at MSDN that the up and coming Internet Explorer 8.0 will adhere to the current web standards by default. Something the developers and the more technically inclined users have been clamoring for, well, just about forever [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been announced at <a title="Microsoft caves: &#8216;Super-standards&#8217; mode to become IE 8 default" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1235" target="_blank">Mary Jo Foley&#8217;s &quot;All About Microsft&quot; blog</a> (ZDNET) and at the <a title="Microsoft&#39;s Interoperability Principles and IE8" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2008/03/03/microsoft-s-interoperability-principles-and-ie8.aspx" target="_blank">IE Blog</a> itself at MSDN that the up and coming Internet Explorer 8.0 will adhere to the current web standards <em>by default</em>. Something the developers and the more technically inclined users have been clamoring for, well, just about forever as far as the WWW and the browsers that surf it are concerned. Even so, I&#8217;ll bet dollars to donuts that users will still complain about it. For myself, this is one of &quot;those things&quot; I&#8217;ve been waiting to happen. Too bad it took about 5 years longer than it should have.</p>
<p>I shall now stand on my head in a deep dish cheese pizza while playing &quot;Hail to Odin&quot; on a tin whistle while also wearing purple spandex shorts with yellow polka dots.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll also believe it when I see it.</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://just-thinkin.net/tag/browsers/" title="browsers" rel="tag">browsers</a>, <a href="http://just-thinkin.net/tag/ie-80/" title="IE 8.0" rel="tag">IE 8.0</a><br />

	<h4>Possibly Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2006/10/ie-70-final-sneaked-out/" title="IE 7.0 final sneaked out (October 21, 2006)">IE 7.0 final sneaked out</a> (0)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2007/12/goodbye-netscape-you-were-the-first/" title="Goodbye Netscape. You were the first. (December 29, 2007)">Goodbye Netscape. You were the first.</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2006/05/go-figure/" title="Go figure&#8230; (May 25, 2006)">Go figure&#8230;</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/ie-80-to-adhere-to-web-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3 beta 4 Soon-Beta 5 in the Trunk</title>
		<link>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/firefox-3-beta-4-soon-beta-5-in-the-trunk/</link>
		<comments>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/firefox-3-beta-4-soon-beta-5-in-the-trunk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirk M</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[BackWoods Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox/Thunderbird]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Firefox 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/firefox-3-beta-4-soon-beta-5-in-the-trunk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Firefox 3 beta 4 will be released soon since as of this morning, the update to the nightly builds (trunk) has now gone to &#34;Minefield/3.0b5pre&#34;. A fifth beta has become necessary due to an outstanding 200 bugs that still need to be fixed. This is not nearly as bad as it might sound [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Firefox 3 beta 4 will be released soon since as of this morning, the update to the nightly builds (trunk) has now gone to &quot;<em>Minefield/3.0b5pre</em>&quot;. A fifth beta has become necessary due to an outstanding 200 bugs that still need to be fixed. This is not nearly as bad as it might sound considering the thousands of bugs that have already been fixed never mind the huge number of enhancements that has gone into this new version and believe me, all that hard work shows.</p>
<p>The beta 4 code freeze was supposed to have taken place back on February 26th and for all intensive purposes it&#8217;s true. The slightly longer than normal delay in getting Firefox 3 Beta 4 out to the public is simply because of the amount of patches and fixes that have &quot;Beta 4&quot; labels stuck on them that need to be incorporated in the new Beta 4 build before release.</p>
<p>Anybody that has attempted to improve on <em>anything</em> from software to business models to remodeling a kitchen and everything in between has found out for every single item you fix 3 new problems crop up<em>&#160;</em>so I had to chuckle at this head slapping remark of an obviously frustrated, self criticizing developer on the need for a fifth beta due to the new bugs cropping up:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We&#8217;re not breaking them because we&#8217;re jerks but because we&#8217;re stupid,&#8221; quipped one of the developers. &#8220;No one is really happy about this. Obviously, .. the goal of beta 4 was [to be]the last beta but it&#8217;s not.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2064">Firefox 3 beta 4 code freeze tonight, beta 5 release looks likely | Open Source | ZDNet.com</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>And I remember <em>that</em> feeling well enough during my years doing R &amp; D. For those of you having a <strike>twisted</strike> technical frame of mind like myself you might want to take a look at the results of a set of tests that were run on Firefox 3 Beta 3 in <a title="Firefox 3 ultimate feature: Performance" href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/02/firefox-3-ultimate-feature-performance/" target="_blank" rel="tag">this article by Percy Cabello</a> at Mozilla Links. From the looks of those tests and from running a few of those tests myself, receiving close to the same results, shows that not only has there been large inroads made on significantly improving the performance of scripting and memory recovery (for example) in Firefox 3 but consistency between users as well which is equally important.</p>
<p><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 0px 5px 0px 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="89" alt="Latest navigation icons" src="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/latest-xp-icons.jpg" width="257" align="left" border="0" /> For the rest of us there&#8217;s been some polishing done on the icon sets, most obvious of which is looks of the <em>keyhole </em>style back and forward buttons of the standard navigation tool bar as seen in this example from my XP powered PC (sorry, I&#8217;ll do Vista when I can afford to buy a brand new PC and/or when the majority of Vista users stop complaining about it).</p>
<p><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; margin: 0px 5px 0px 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="86" alt="Latest add-ons XP icons" src="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/latest-add-ons-xp-icons.jpg" width="286" align="left" border="0" /> Also the <em>Add-ons Manager</em> recieved a new icon for the <em>Plugins. </em>I&#8217;m not too sure if I&#8217;m hip with the new purple color but the color and shape of a singular icon IMHO is hardly worth griping about.</p>
<p>And finally a bit of &quot;buffing out&quot; to the <em>Options</em> dialog to finish it off. To be honest about it I know that some (very) minor changes have been made within the last few builds but for the life of me I can&#8217;t remember the looks of every single nightly build I&#8217;ve downloaded. Maybe one of you can see what it might be. Either way, I like the latest &quot;polish&quot;.</p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/options-xp-icons.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="84" alt="Options XP icons" src="http://just-thinkin.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/options-xp-icons-thumb.jpg" width="429" border="0" /></a>&#160;</p>
<p align="left">If you&#8217;re a Firefox user you certainly can&#8217;t say that the beginning of 2008 has been boring at all. The developers at Mozilla seem to be absolutely obsessed with stomping <em>all</em> of the bugs flat this time. As an old(er) beta tester I can attest here and now that it&#8217;s simply not possible to&#160; get all of them, it&#8217;s just the nature of the beast, but I can honestly say that I haven&#8217;t seen such a concentrated effort on the part of a development team as displayed in the past several weeks by the Firefox team. Hope they meet with success otherwise I fear for their mental well being.</p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:f38865d3-dddf-4428-ae88-c3ad3a2ccfa9" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/firefox" rel="tag">firefox</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/firefox%203" rel="tag">firefox 3</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/firefox%203%20beta%204" rel="tag">firefox 3 beta 4</a></div>

	Tags: <a href="http://just-thinkin.net/tag/firefox/" title="Firefox" rel="tag">Firefox</a>, <a href="http://just-thinkin.net/tag/firefox-3/" title="Firefox 3" rel="tag">Firefox 3</a><br />

	<h4>Possibly Related posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2007/04/on-pmetrics-amaldo-and-firefox-3/" title="On Pmetrics, Amaldo and Firefox 3 (April 25, 2007)">On Pmetrics, Amaldo and Firefox 3</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2008/04/mozilla-squashes-firefox-3-flash-bug/" title="Mozilla squashes Firefox 3 Flash Bug (April 24, 2008)">Mozilla squashes Firefox 3 Flash Bug</a> (16)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2008/04/lousy-streaming-video-in-firefox-dont-blame-the-browser/" title="Lousy Streaming Video in Firefox? Don&#8217;t Blame the Browser. (April 12, 2008)">Lousy Streaming Video in Firefox? Don&#8217;t Blame the Browser.</a> (2)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2008/04/keeping-an-eye-on-firefox-3-rc1/" title="Keeping an Eye on Firefox 3 RC1 (April 26, 2008)">Keeping an Eye on Firefox 3 RC1</a> (12)</li>
	<li><a href="http://just-thinkin.net/2008/04/getting-off-the-trunk-firefox-3-rc1-upcoming-release/" title="Getting off the Trunk-Firefox 3 RC1 Upcoming Release (April 14, 2008)">Getting off the Trunk-Firefox 3 RC1 Upcoming Release</a> (0)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://just-thinkin.net/2008/03/firefox-3-beta-4-soon-beta-5-in-the-trunk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.651 seconds -->
